I was in Victoria’s Secret a few days ago. Brad expressed a Christmas wish for me to dress up in holiday lingerie so skimpy that it will certainly earn me a place on Santa’s naughty list. I often hesitate to spend much money on lingerie because my husband’s litmus test is this — throw it on the ground; if it looks good, buy it because it’s going to end up there in about a millisecond after donning it anyway.
But it’s his Christmas wish. And I aim to please.
The trouble is: When did Victoria’s Secret get so . . . un-sexy? I saw five or six truly skimpy and sexy nighties. The rest of the store was full to brimming with cotton pajama bottoms, rhinestoned tank tops, and soft knit baby doll nightgowns in little floral prints.
Victoria’s Secret used to be a store I could not take my kids into and, indeed, often felt the need to cover their eyes when walking past because the mannequins and posters in the windows were so scantily clad and provocatively posed. When I was there the other day, mothers were pushing their toddlers through the store in strollers!
How sexy can the lingerie be when the store is overrun by children and harassed, sleep-deprived mothers? I ask you.
I did find a few hot little numbers that I wanted to try on. One of which was a red vinyl micro-mini skirt trimmed in white faux fur with fishnet stocking for added effect. But the entrance to the dressing room was clogged by a pre-teen who was watching her baby brother in his stroller while her mother tried on bras. Besides that, I couldn’t find a clerk who could help me.
So, I turned to the Internet. I may or may not have ordered a skimpy, sexy li’l red outfit. And it may or may not have arrived on my door step — in pink.

No worries, though. I can make do with my Santa’s helper outfit from years past. This year’s not the first that Brad’s asked for lingerie, after all.
The old outfit is a little bit sexy and a little bit sweet. It may not earn me a place on the naughty list, but Santa will definitely be checking twice.
